Internet Governance
Netnod provides expert input in policy, regulatory and governance discussions that directly impact the context within which we operate.
The updated proposal continues to include the same issues as highlighted by Netnod in the prior consultation: never promote backdoors, do not forbid end-to-end-encryption and do not harmonise the legal frameworks for number dependent and number independent services.
The Internet is a global matter that requires multistakeholder management and must not be governed by national or EU legislation. It is crucial to differentiate between the Internet itself and the services that rely on it.
Netnod argues for keeping content and distribution separate, ensuring that any content can be delivered across any platform. Netnod also stresses the need for robust and available services, especially in times of crisis.
Netnod believes that the act named Cybersecurity risk management & reporting obligations for digital infrastructure, providers and ICT service managers will not lead to the intended effect.
Netnod believes that the white paper does not take into account the design and architecture of the Internet and does not recognise the importance of the Internet for society.
At a high level Netnod has three main concerns with the NIS2 directive and its Swedish implementation in a cybersecurity context.
Netnod is of the opinion that PTS suggests a geographical and product market definition which implies that electronic communications services are vertically integrated services, rather than services produced through the coordination of many actors, many of which are network operators.
Netnod is critical of the suggestion to force private actors to participate in such a group, and instead Netnod suggests that participation should be based on market logic. That is, the public should use market instruments rather than legal impositions to ensure fruitful participation.
Netnod has answered that there are substantial challenges for connectivity in Sweden. Most importantly, the public needs to be able and willing to finance robust and resilient digital infrastructure.
Netnod notes the increased interest to ensure proper functioning of the Internet, although through vague terms such as “broadband” and “gigabit infrastructure” rather than specifying what the Internet or Internet Access is. Netnod is of the opinion that the legislator should take height for the global and distributed nature of the Internet and design policy thereafter.
Netnod has commented on several aspects of the consultation, but with emphasis on the issues of end-to-end-regulation in the space of vertically separated communications services. The consultation suggests that number independent interpersonal communications can be compared to telephony in terms of control over the message flow and contents. This is simply not true.